Saturday, April 23, 2011

Flagging this year's pass rushers

This is a great year for pass rushers, but history tells us many of these great prospects will not turn into NFL stars. A previous post outlines measurables that can be used to eliminate players as possible future Pro Bowlers. Here's a look at this year's top players and how they stack up to the filter. I'll be using a combination of Mel Kiper and Todd McShay's mock drafts to get a list of possible 1st round talents who project as either 3-4 outside linebackers or 4-3 defensive ends.
NamePosition40 dash10yd splitBroad jumpVertical
Robert QuinnDE4.70?9'834
Da'Quan BowersDE????
Von MillerOLB4.521.5710'637
Akeem AyersOLB4.88?9'831
Ryan KerriganDE4.711.6110'233.5
Brooks ReedDE4.651.549'530.5
Adrian ClaybornDE4.831.619'533
Allen BaileyDE4.771.679'936.5
Aldon SmithDE4.781.669'1034
Justin HoustonDE4.681.6210'536.5

I've marked scores that meet the guidelines in green, ones that fall below but have precedent for other players succeeding with yellow, and no previous successes with red. Overall, the group measures fairly well, but without a single player who meets every guideline for their projected position.

The numbers don't dispute everyone's opinion that Von Miller is a can't-miss prospect. He is just 1 inch short of the guideline on his vertical jump, and far exceeds all other guidelines. Perhaps surprisingly, Justin Houston passes every guideline for a future Pro Bowler, and by this metric has the highest upside.

The next thing that stands out is Akeem Ayers shortcomings across the board. This is not a guy who should go in the 1st round, or that a team should expect a strong pass rush from. He seems entirely miscast in this role.

Brooks Reed flashes good speed and a blazing 10 yard split, especially for a 4-3 DE, but he also has a curiously low vertical jump. He clearly fails the guidelines, but so does Clay Matthews in this respect. Perhaps he could make the transition to a 3-4 OLB by shedding some weight in exchange for more speed.

Clayborn, Kerrigan, Smith and Allen show good promise as 4-3 ends. All suffer from a lack of pure speed, but show great short-area quickness. There's some talk of Kerrigan player 3-4 OLB, but his lack of pure speed would become a liability unless he can shed some weight and gain speed.

This leaves us with our two most unknown commodities. Da'Quan Bowers has no reliable measurables. Watching him on film reminds me of Calais Campbell, and perhaps he's actually best suited to be a 3-4 end, or even a 4-3 tackle. He does a great job of locking out, shedding blocks, but I don't seem the explosiveness required to be a pass rush threat. Robert Quinn's numbers put him squarely into the 4-3 role, where nothing about his measurables is a turnoff.

Overall, the top prospects come with a few concerns, and all but Ayers should make an impact at the next level. Miller proves his upside. Kerrigan and Reed are both possibly interesting for conversion to 3-4 edge rushers. Bowers is a big question mark still. I'm skeptical about Bowers and down on Ayers, but the other players have the tangibles to challenge for at least occasional Pro Bowl consideration, and at least be solid career starters worth taking in the 1st round.

The Outside Linebacker Smell Test

No, this isn't a deodorant commercial.

There's a lot of debate every year heading into the draft about how to select the next great pass rusher. Do you take college production? Raw potential? One-year wonders? Can a non-stop motor make up for limited physical skills?

The numbers are a little spotty because not all players run every event, but over the last 10 years virtually all Pro Bowl 3-4 outside linebackers have elite measurables in a number of combine events:
  • 40 time of 4.64 or better
  • 10 second split of 1.62 or better
  • Broad jump of 10' or better
  • Vertical of 38" or better

    There are remarkably few exceptions to these rules.
  • Julian Peterson ran a 4.68, Terrell Suggs ran a 4.81. Neither had any other measurement available.
  • Clay Matthews's vertical was only 35.5", but his 10-yard split was the fastest of the group at 1.49

    Of course plenty of players have similar measurables and never work out ("Vernon Gholston" should be familiar somehow). It's interesting to note that bench press and 3-cone seem unrelated to future success.

    A similar list can be constructed for 4-3 defensive ends, and the values don't look too much different:
  • 40 time of 4.68 or better*
  • Vertical of 37" or better**
  • Broad jump of 9'9 or better
  • 10-yard splits are far too sparse to call out values
    * There is a group in the 4.70-4.76 who are notorious motor guys (J.Allen, K.Vanden Bosch, A.Kampman, A.Schobel).
    ** Allen and Kampman posted verticals of only 33"

    A followup post will evaluate this year's prospects against these guidelines.
  • Sunday, February 6, 2011

    Risky picking a quarterback

    There's a lot of debate about how and where a team should draft a quarterback, but it's pretty clear players outside the 1st or 2nd round are unlikely to succeed. Players drafted over the last 15 years have accounted for 48 pro bowl appearances, and a few clear trends jump out:
    1. 40 of those 48 appearances are by players drafted in the first 11 picks
    2. 35 of those 48 appearances are by players drafted in the first 5 picks
    3. 24 of those 48 appearances are by players drafted in the first 2 picks
    4. 18 of those 48 appearances are by players drafted with the top overall pick
    5. Only 13 of those appearances are by players drafted after another player who never made a pro bowl.

    In other words, franchise quarterbacks come from high picks, and usually the ones people expect to be the stars. But, there's a catch. Those pro bowl appearances come from a lot of repeats, and those high picks also have a lot of misses. Peyton Manning has 11 appearances by himself, and there isn't another top pick AFC pro bowl quarterback for 5 years (Carson Palmer). Another set of much uglier truths emerges:

    1. 12 of 25 top 11 picks never make a pro bowl
    2. 10 of 20 top 5 picks never make a pro bowl
    3. 7 of 12 top 2 picks never make a pro bowl
    4. 6 of 10 top picks never make a pro bowl
    5. 5 of 15 draft classes have no pro bowlers in the first 2 rounds

    In other words, not every year has a franchise quarterback, and even if it does, picking that guy from the obvious choices doesn't pan out about half the time. Teams need to be smart and know if they are really getting a great player, or just the best guy in that particular class (or perhaps not even that).

    Wednesday, December 8, 2010

    Boise St Screwed

    So Boise State is ending up in the Las Vegas Bowl, which is a relatively mediocre game. They will probably crush Utah, and have no financial motivation to care what game they go to this year (http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/12/06/1444809/boise-state-to-play-utah-on-dec.html).

    The argument comes down to Arkansas being given the bid over the Broncos. Wouldn't it be delicious to actually have Boise St vs Ohio St in a BCS Bowl, with Ohio State's President E. Gordon Gee's commentary about the superiority of BCS teams hanging in the air? This one could be hyped up like a boxing match. A classic Drago vs Rocky affair. I think the BCS missed out on a great opportunity to do justice and score awesome ratings.

    It seems they were more interested in avoiding future contention if the game wasn't a blowout by the Buckeyes.

    Sunday, December 5, 2010

    TopoRank Bowl Predictions

    Time to handicap all the bowl games!:

    VisitorHomePredictSpreadActual
    BYUUTEP17.011.5-1228
    Northern IllinoisFresno St1.12.5-323
    OhioTroy4.4-(1-1.5)-27
    S.MississippiLouisville7.73.53
    UtahBoise St17.316-1723
    NavySan Diego State5.6----
    HawaiiTulsa10.512-12.5-27
    Florida IntlToledo6.81.5-22
    Air ForceGeorgia Tech4.42-2.57
    West VirginiaNorth Carolina St7.12.516
    MissouriIowa6.10-1-3
    East CarolinaMaryland16.47.5-831
    IllinoisBaylor5.7-(1.5-2)24
    Oklahoma StArizona1.6626
    ArmySMU3.2----
    Kansas StSyracuse12.32-3-2
    North CarolinaTennessee6.9-(1.5-2.5)-3
    NebraskaWashington15.313-13.5-12
    South FloridaClemson3.24-4.5-5
    Notre DameMiami2.03-16
    Georgia UCF11.37-4
    South CarolinaFlorida St0.13-9
    NorthwesternTexas Tech5.29-9.57
    FloridaPenn St7.6713
    AlabamaMichigan St13.610.5-1142
    Mississippi StMichigan3.0638
    WisconsinTCU8.62.5-32
    ConnecticutOklahoma18.217-1828
    StanfordVirginia Tech14.53-3.528
    Ohio StArkansas7.63-3.55
    Middle TennesseeMiami (OH)6.31.5-214
    LSUTexas A&M1.7-1-17
    PittsburghKentucky4.82.5-317
    NevadaBoston College21.19.5-107
    OregonAuburn16.7-(2.5-3)-3

    Boise State is the clear Bowl placement loser here, and Connecticut is a questionable choice for the Fiesta Bowl. Swapping those two would do them justice and avoid a couple of ho-hum blowout games.

    TopoRank finishes the bowl season 17 of 33, which loses just short of 2%.
    I'll have to take a long hard look at the theory behind it, and perhaps change it up for next year.

    NCAA 2010 Rankings, pre-bowl

    The final regular season games have been played, and the bowl games are posted. Time to start with the new TopoRankings, out to the top 100 to include all the bowl contestants. Each team also has its TopoRanking value listed. Every point differential correlates with a team being '7 points better':

    1. 22.135 Oregon
    2. 21.270 Boise St
    3. 21.254 Stanford
    4. 20.738 Ohio State
    5. 20.439 TCU
    6. 20.153 Alabama
    7. 19.983 Nebraska
    8. 19.754 Auburn
    9. 19.725 Oklahoma
    10. 19.717 Missouri
    11. 19.703 Oklahoma St
    12. 19.654 Arkansas
    13. 19.469 Arizona
    14. 19.346 Nevada
    15. 19.287 Texas A&M
    16. 19.270 Oregon St
    17. 19.214 Wisconsin
    18. 19.178 Virginia Tech
    19. 19.112 Arizona St
    20. 19.093 Southern Cal
    21. 19.042 LSU
    22. 18.849 South Carolina
    23. 18.843 Iowa
    24. 18.841 Florida St
    25. 18.831 West Virginia
    26. 18.794 Utah
    27. 18.760 Georgia
    28. 18.516 Miami FL
    29. 18.504 California
    30. 18.373 Florida
    31. 18.234 Notre Dame
    32. 18.211 Michigan St
    33. 18.150 Hawai`i
    34. 18.044 Kansas St
    35. 18.006 Mississippi St
    36. 18.000 Tennessee
    37. 17.902 Northern Illinois
    38. 17.899 Illinois
    39. 17.886 Clemson
    40. 17.810 North Carolina St
    41. 17.804 Washington
    42. 17.762 San Diego St
    43. 17.708 Texas
    44. 17.700 Pittsburgh
    45. 17.651 Maryland
    46. 17.606 Louisville
    47. 17.572 Michigan
    48. 17.509 UCLA
    49. 17.424 South Florida
    50. 17.414 Air Force
    51. 17.289 Penn State
    52. 17.262 Texas Tech
    53. 17.151 Brigham Young
    54. 17.142 Central Florida
    55. 17.122 Connecticut
    56. 17.081 Baylor
    57. 17.016 Kentucky
    58. 17.013 North Carolina
    59. 16.968 Navy
    60. 16.889 Colorado
    61. 16.793 Temple
    62. 16.787 Cincinnati
    63. 16.783 Georgia Tech
    64. 16.758 Fresno St
    65. 16.686 Mississippi
    66. 16.646 Tulsa
    67. 16.552 Iowa St
    68. 16.544 Houston
    69. 16.517 Northwestern
    70. 16.509 Southern Miss
    71. 16.457 Louisiana Tech
    72. 16.406 SMU
    73. 16.377 Villanova
    74. 16.334 Boston College
    75. 16.307 Western Michigan
    76. 16.285 Syracuse
    77. 16.045 Washington St
    78. 16.030 Toledo
    79. 15.956 Army
    80. 15.918 Idaho
    81. 15.886 Purdue
    82. 15.880 Ohio U.
    83. 15.852 Minnesota
    84. 15.749 Delaware
    85. 15.736 Northern Arizona
    86. 15.668 William & Mary
    87. 15.665 Duke
    88. 15.639 Rutgers
    89. 15.623 Virginia
    90. 15.552 Wake Forest
    91. 15.539 Eastern Washington
    92. 15.526 Sacramento St
    93. 15.503 Central Michigan
    94. 15.481 Vanderbilt
    95. 15.440 Kent St
    96. 15.420 Utah St
    97. 15.419 NW Missouri St
    98. 15.367 Western Illinois
    99. 15.321 New Hampshire
    100. 15.320 Appalachian St

    The next post will handicap all bowl game, and we can debate which teams got short-changed in the selection process.

    Saturday, December 4, 2010

    Looking Back: BCS conference games

    To cover a few games we might not otherwise hit, I'm looking at all the BCS conference games for this week. In the future, I think I'll post all BCS and Top 25 games.

    Pac-10
    VisitorHomePredictSpreadActual
    ACC
    21. Florida St15. Virginia Tech0.93.5-4.511
    Big 12
    9. Oklahoma13. Nebraska3.84-6.53
    Big East
    Rutgers24. West Virginia19.119.5-20.521
    PittsburghCincinnati2.60-218
    ConnecticutSouth Florida32-2.5-3
    Big Ten
    IllinoisFresno St12.2?skip
    Pac-10
    2. OregonOregon St25.215.5-16.517
    Arizona St23. Arizona3.35-6.5-1
    WashingtonWashington St1.85.5-87
    USCUCLA7.16.5-8skip
    SEC
    1. Auburn19. South Carolina1.45-639

    I can no longer find reliable spread numbers for the Illinois-Fresno St game, so I won't count it. TopoRank hits 5 of 10 BCS conference games. There were a number of close calls, but this week comes out to a slight loss.

    I'm looking forward to the bowl season!


    Contributors

    Followers